Any F That Sends F to Integral of F is Uniformly Continuous
This topic concerns a very classical question: extend of a function between two metric spaces to obtain a new function
enjoying certain properties . I am interested in the following three properties:
- Continuity,
- Uniformly continuity,
- Pointwise equi-continuity, and
- Uniformly equi-continuity.
Throughout this topic, by and
we mean metric spaces with metrics
and
respectively.
CONTINUITY IS NOT ENOUGH . Let us consider the first situation where the given function is only assumed to be continuous. In this scenario, there is no hope that we can extend such a continuous function
to obtain a new continuous function
. The following counter-example demonstrates this:
Let and let
be any continuous function on
such that there is a positive gap between
and
. For example, we can choose
Since is monotone increasing, we clearly have
Hence any extension of
cannot be continuous because
will be discontinuous at
. Thus, we have just shown that continuity is not enough. For this reason, we require
to be uniformly continuous.
SIMPLE OBSERVATIONS . We start with the following basic results.
Claim 1. Let
be uniformly continuous. Then if
is a Cauchy sequence in
, then
is a Cauchy sequence in
.
This is a very classical and simple result. The proof simply makes use of the definition of uniform continuity and Cauchy's sequence. It is interesting to note that if is closed, then we can drop "uniformly". This is because continuous function on a bounded set is always uniformly continuous.
In reverse, the statement is also true under certain conditions, for example, any real-valued function from a bounded set is uniformly continuous if it sends any Cauchy sequence to a Cauchy sequence. It is worth noting that the boundedness is essential. We do not consider the situation of functions between metric spaces in this post.
Claim 2. Assume that the hypotheses of Claim 1 hold. Then if both
and
converge to
, then
![]()
This is also a classical and simple result. The proof goes as follows: we mix the two sequences: which also converges to
. From this the two limits
and
must be equal.
UNIFORMLY CONTINUOUS EXTENSION . Since continuity of is not enough, in general, to extend, we are forced to assume a uniform continuity. We hope that this is enough to prove that the extended function
is continuous. However, we can do more. The following claim confirms that the extended function, in fact, is also uniformly continuous.
Claim 3. Let
be complete and
is uniformly continuous. Then there exists a unique continuous extension
. Moreover,
is also uniformly continuous.
Proof. The proof of Claim 3 goes as follows. Let
be arbitrary. Then there exists a sequence
converging to
, namely,
as
. Clearly,
is a Cauchy sequence in
, which by Claim 1, implies that
is Cauchy in
. Therefore, we can define
![]()
The preceding limit exists because
is complete. By Claim 2, the value
is independent of the choice of
.
Continuity of
. We now claim that
is continuous. Indeed, fix a point
and assume that
converges to
. It suffices to show that
![]()
To see this, given
, there is
such that
![]()
For each
with
, let
be a sequence converging to
. One one hand, by the definition of
, there holds
![]()
On the other hand, given
, by Claim 1, there is some
such that
![]()
which, by triangle inequality, gives
![]()
Hence
![]()
which implies that
![]()
This tells us that
![]()
However, from the choice of
, we can also estimate
![]()
Hence,
![]()
Thus we have shown that
![]()
The conclusion follows.
Uniqueness of
. This is obvious because
is dense in
.
Uniform continuity of
. Let
be given and let
be such that
![]()
whenever
. Let
be arbitrary such that
![]()
By definition, there are two points
such that
![]()
Notice that
![]()
Hence
![]()
proving the uniform continuity of
.
UNIFORMLY EQUI-CONTINUOUS EXTENSION . We now turn out attention to a family of uniformly continuous functions.
Claim 4. Let
be complete and
is a family of uniformly continuous functions
. If the family
is uniformly equi-continuous on
, then the uniquely extended family
of uniformly continuous functions on
obtained from Claim 3 is also uniformly equi-continuous.
Proof. Clearly, the unique family
consists of uniformly continuous functions on
. We need to verify the uniformly equip-continuity of the family. By the definition, it suffices to show that given any
, there is some
depending only on
such that
![]()
for any
and for any
with
![]()
Keep in mind that the family
is already uniformly equi-continuous on
. Using this fact, let
be such that
![]()
whenever
![]()
Now we let
be arbitrary such that
![]()
As before, for an arbitrary but fixed function
, there are two points
such that
![]()
We use the sub index
to denote the dependence on the function
being consider. Notice that
![]()
which then implies that
![]()
Putting all estimates above together we deduce that
![]()
for any
, whenever
![]()
proving the uniform equi-continuity of
.
AN APPLICATION . To conclude the note, we consider the well-known Arzelà-Ascoli theorem which states that any pointwise bounded sequence of functions in , where
is compact, which is also uniformly equi-continous, is precompact in
. There are counter-examples in the literature saying that the compactness of
is essential. For example, any translation of a smoothly compactly supported function on
would work. We shall, however, demonstrate that we cannot construct any similar counter-example on bounded sets which are not closed.
Since the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem concerns the pointwise boundedness, in the following claim, we address this property through the extending process as before.
Claim 5. Let
be complete and
is a family of uniformly equi-continuous functions
. If the family
is pointwise bounded on
, then the uniquely extended family
obtained from Claim 3 is also pointwise bounded on
.
Proof. Let
be arbitrary. By definition, we need to prove that
![]()
Fix any
and by the uniform equi-continuity of
, we can let
be such that
![]()
whenever
with
![]()
By way of contradiction, there is a sequence of
such that
![]()
Now we choose some
in such a way that
and fix it. Clearly,
![]()
Since the right hand side is bounded, we obtain a contradiction. Hence the extended family
is also pointwise bounded.
Combining Claims 4 and 5 we deduce that on any pre-compact subset , a family of functions in
which is also pointwise bounded and uniformly equiv-continuous is pre-compact in
. Therefore, we are in position to conclude that one cannot construct a counter-example of the well-known Arzelà-Ascoli theorem against the compactness of
, however, only on any bounded subset
. An unbounded set is the only possibility that we can construct.
I thank Nguyễn Đức Bảo for useful discussion during the preparation of this note.
Source: https://anhngq.wordpress.com/2019/04/14/extending-functions-between-metric-spaces-continuity-uniform-continuity-and-uniform-equicontinuity/